I think the idea is that you would have many environments and each one is a voter. If an AGI candidate wins the board game vote but no others (the hunter-gathe

I think the idea is that you would have many environments and each one is a voter. If an AGI candidate wins the board game vote but no others (the hunter-gathering vote, the walking and crawling vote, the "publish or perish" vote, etc), it will be trounced by something that is not quite so good at board games but is more flexible and adaptable - i.e., general. I'm an AGI skeptic myself, but I do think that's the best attempt at a formalism for ranking AGI attempts that I've seen so far (disclaimer: as a skeptic I haven't exactly done a deep dive into the field).