2 ms·
You’re watching corruption in real time Here. Lorena Gonzalez is openly condemning the court system and corporations are flexing how much they’ll spend if they
by nemo44x 7y ago
You’re watching corruption in real time Here. Lorena Gonzalez is openly condemning the court system and corporations are flexing how much they’ll spend if they can’t cut a deal.
Regulations like these lead to lobbying which leads to corruption. This isn’t about “justice for workers” - it’s a shakedown by politicians in a single party state.
- shams93 7y agoBetween Jerry Brown and Pat Brown one single family has ruled the state as governor for over 40 years combined.
- thephyber 7y ago> over 40 years combined Are you counting in base10? I count[1] 6 terms of 4 years each = 24 years. 67% off. Not bad for government work. If your argument is a Democrat in the governorship, since 1942 it's (R=47, D=30). Since 1958 it's (R=31, D=30). Republicans are at least equally to blame for California's governorship. In practice, the governor is largely about qualities of a single person. The legislature is heavily skewed D/blue because that's how density votes in the US. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_governors_of_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_governors_of_Californi...
- thephyber 7y ago> Lorena Gonzalez is openly condemning the court system Can you explain your thinking here? From my reading, the law she wrote/sponsored was largely aligned with the Supreme Court of California interpretation of the Dynamex case.
- nemo44x 7y agoShe says that they are “delaying justice” by taking their grievance to “the courts”. I read it as a condemnation of the courts as an obstacle to her view of what justice is. Any law maker should embrace a court challenge to their law. Suggesting the courts are an obstacle to their constituent’s is bad precedent.