I was taught that the quantum theory of memory and cognition generally falls under Eric Schwartz's "neuro-bagging" fallacy [0]. That is: >You assert that an ar

I was taught that the quantum theory of memory and cognition generally falls under Eric Schwartz's "neuro-bagging" fallacy [0]. That is: >You assert that an area of physics or mathematics familiar to few neuroscientists solves a fundamental problem in their field. Example: "The cerebellum is a tensor of rank 10^12; sensory and motor activity is contravariant and covariant vectors". So yeah, I feel that it's pretty fringe (as you suggested). [0] https://web.archive.org/web/20170828092031/http://cns-web.bu.edu/~eric/comp_neuro_tricks.html https://web.archive.org/web/20170828092031/http://cns-web.bu...