3 ms·
> The point is that even MDACC figured out is was too expensive to continue their own EMR. I think then that the example does not prove your point. It would h
by jhayward 7y ago
> The point is that even MDACC figured out is was too expensive to continue their own EMR.
I think then that the example does not prove your point. It would have been vastly better, financially and medically, for MDACC to have continued with their in-house EMR.
- inetknght 7y ago> It would have been vastly better, financially and medically, for MDACC to have continued with their in-house EMR. ...until they (too) fall victim to "a rogue engineer" (or a "patient") coming in and plugging something into an open USB port on the workstation.