4 ms·
The reason why we haven't seen use of atomic weapons is that it's clear that use of atomic weapons will be met with more atomic weapons. It's not clear that th
by X6S1x6Okd1st 7y ago
The reason why we haven't seen use of atomic weapons is that it's clear that use of atomic weapons will be met with more atomic weapons.
It's not clear that the state is worried about retaliation against wide area surveillance.
- whatshisface 7y agoI don't think it was ever clear that atomic weapons wouldn't be used, especially not near the time of their invention. Remember the Cold War?
- jdbernard 7y agoHe didn't say they wouldn't be used, quite the opposite. He said there was certainty that if they were used, your opponent would respond with more of the same. This led to the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction from the Cold War. Stated another way: if we use them we know they will be used on us, so we'd better not use them. OP's point was the there is no similar guaranteed retaliation that might motivate restraint in the use of surveillance.
- kian 7y agoIt will be once it's used against the people running said state.