5 ms·

Absolutely. Right now on the newsfeed, the journalist is holding the US spokesperson's feet to the fire about the disconnect between the US' support for Mubara

Absolutely. Right now on the newsfeed, the journalist is holding the US spokesperson's feet to the fire about the disconnect between the US' support for Mubarak, and it's expressed principles in favor of democracy. They are directly pointing out the hypocrisy of the US' position. It's the kind of journalism we're just not used to anymore in the U.S.

mkramlich 16y ago
Agreed that it is non-ideal and unpleasant that the US backs Mubarak. However, you make a big assumption. Because in reality, the alternative to Mubarak is not necessarily democracy. It might be another autocrat. And it might be something even worse. Freedom does not necessarily lead to a bunch of shiny happy people living safely on a shining hill. Sometimes it leads to anarchy or genocide or war.
- michaelchisari 16y ago
  However, you make a big assumption. I make no such assumption, but I'm not willing to support dictatorship in order to avoid dictatorship. Straussian compromises of democratic values quite honestly make my blood run cold.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- teyc 16y ago
  Mubarak was hacking the US in the sense that US needed an Arabian partner who was willing to be an intermediary between Palestinians and Israel. Reality is that Mubarak hasn't been of any use to Egypt. If he is disposed, he is just another old man who have achieved little despite of his power.
jdminhbg 16y ago
That strikes me as less "spin free" than "a useful countervailing spin."
nir 16y ago
I think it's hilarious the same people who complain about corporate/government interests affecting Western media often praise Al Jazeera. Do you really assume Qatar's Emir funds the network out of sheer philanthropy, or some passion for quality journalism? Al Jazeera does not cover issues that are uncomfortable to Qatar - whether it's the WikiLeaks Qatar documents, where they urge the US to strike Iran or issues within Qatar itself. Their hard-hitting coverage is limited to issues that won't harm Qatar's interests - in much the same way USSR's Pravda might cover American corruption. It's amazing how easy it is to fool people with just a slightly more sophisticated approach.
- michaelchisari 16y ago
  Al Jazeera's relationship with Qatar is similar to the BBC's relationship with the UK. Their internal reporting is very different from their international reporting due to this, just as with the BBC. That doesn't change the fact that their international reporting, much like the BBC's, is quite good. To compare it to Pravda is ridiculous.
  - nir 16y ago
    This is exactly the kind of ridiculous relativism I'm talking about. The UK is a democracy where some of the taxpayer's money goes towards financing the BBC. Qatar is a monarchy, where the control of the nation is passed within Al Thani dyansty which uses some of its oil/gas revenues to finance Al Jazeera. When the BBC reports something that is inconvenient to the UK government, as it often does, there's no real risk involved. Al Jazeera simply does not report things inconvenient to Qatar's Emir, with good reason.
    - michaelchisari 16y ago
      It's a very simple idea that one can independently evaluate the quality of the reporting, regardless of funding source, especially when Al Jazeera is not the primary source of information (as no news agency should be).
      - 16y ago

mkramlich 16y ago

Agreed that it is non-ideal and unpleasant that the US backs Mubarak. However, you make a big assumption. Because in reality, the alternative to Mubarak is not necessarily democracy. It might be another autocrat. And it might be something even worse. Freedom does not necessarily lead to a bunch of shiny happy people living safely on a shining hill. Sometimes it leads to anarchy or genocide or war.

michaelchisari 16y ago
However, you make a big assumption. I make no such assumption, but I'm not willing to support dictatorship in order to avoid dictatorship. Straussian compromises of democratic values quite honestly make my blood run cold.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
teyc 16y ago
Mubarak was hacking the US in the sense that US needed an Arabian partner who was willing to be an intermediary between Palestinians and Israel. Reality is that Mubarak hasn't been of any use to Egypt. If he is disposed, he is just another old man who have achieved little despite of his power.

jdminhbg 16y ago

That strikes me as less "spin free" than "a useful countervailing spin."

nir 16y ago

I think it's hilarious the same people who complain about corporate/government interests affecting Western media often praise Al Jazeera. Do you really assume Qatar's Emir funds the network out of sheer philanthropy, or some passion for quality journalism? Al Jazeera does not cover issues that are uncomfortable to Qatar - whether it's the WikiLeaks Qatar documents, where they urge the US to strike Iran or issues within Qatar itself. Their hard-hitting coverage is limited to issues that won't harm Qatar's interests - in much the same way USSR's Pravda might cover American corruption. It's amazing how easy it is to fool people with just a slightly more sophisticated approach.

michaelchisari 16y ago
Al Jazeera's relationship with Qatar is similar to the BBC's relationship with the UK. Their internal reporting is very different from their international reporting due to this, just as with the BBC. That doesn't change the fact that their international reporting, much like the BBC's, is quite good. To compare it to Pravda is ridiculous.
- nir 16y ago
  This is exactly the kind of ridiculous relativism I'm talking about. The UK is a democracy where some of the taxpayer's money goes towards financing the BBC. Qatar is a monarchy, where the control of the nation is passed within Al Thani dyansty which uses some of its oil/gas revenues to finance Al Jazeera. When the BBC reports something that is inconvenient to the UK government, as it often does, there's no real risk involved. Al Jazeera simply does not report things inconvenient to Qatar's Emir, with good reason.
  - michaelchisari 16y ago
    It's a very simple idea that one can independently evaluate the quality of the reporting, regardless of funding source, especially when Al Jazeera is not the primary source of information (as no news agency should be).
    - 16y ago