4 ms·

Thanks for the discussion > If nobody has a convincing argument for the proper balance in that tradeoff-space, though, it makes me wonder if it's simply a matt

Thanks for the discussion > If nobody has a convincing argument for the proper balance in that tradeoff-space, though, it makes me wonder if it's simply a matter of personal preference / opinion for everyone involved. I would suspect that it is, so I guess we've gone a bit meta because the "accepted" way for large organizations of humans to make these trade-offs is politics So then is it right to say the solution to "too much politics at work" is office politics to decide the right amount of politics at work?

DoofusOfDeath 7y ago
> So then is it right to say the solution to "too much politics at work" is office politics to decide the right amount of politics at work? I have the feeling I'm a few philosophy-degrees short of being confident in any particular answer to that question :( I hate it when discussions about potentially important topics end with a muddle of uncertainty about metaphysical matters. It seems to end this way just about every time.