3 ms·
Will point out that it is cloning after a short sample and with an unknown speaker. So this is great for that type of comparison and in particular when the pers
by gist 7y ago
Will point out that it is cloning after a short sample and with an unknown speaker. So this is great for that type of comparison and in particular when the person listening does not know much or have great experience with the person speaking.
Now if you were to take something by a well known person (where there is a great deal of audio) it would be much harder to clone anything other than a really short passage.
This would be similar to faking handwriting. Easier to fake one word than to fake three pages. Easier to fake something where you have little to compare a pattern (less can go wrong).
Not saying this isn't impressive it is. But it's also a bit of a trick based on the very short clips (both samples and created).
I would say that a trained person could do a better fake because they could take into account all the info and be less likely to make a mistake.
Now sure you could manually change the AI as well doing the same thing.