3 ms·
This is a good point. If and as they proceed, they'd better run more than the usual level of due diligence to insure they don't become a vector for something n
by pasbesoin 16y ago
This is a good point. If and as they proceed, they'd better run more than the usual level of due diligence to insure they don't become a vector for something nasty.
Google properties are some of the few I let through without a lot of filtering (Gmail in particular). If it looks like they are becoming a vector, this will lessen their utility for me and I will tighten the hatches on them.
(Of course, I suppose this factor won't apply for 99% of their users. We may be the outliers having no statistical significance. At least, until something big enough and bad enough slips through.)
I have mixed feelings about blocking advertising that provides supporting revenue, but two factors override: Motion (and occasionally, sound), that completely and thoroughly distracts me from the page content and which, over prolonged exposure, leaves me "frazzled" and ineffective; and malware. (Also, when graphics are overwhelmingly "bright" compared to the content, I need to dial them down.)
Nothing that hasn't been said a thousand times before, I suppose.
- bioh42_2 16y agoI too fear we are outliers. But surely there must be a market for people like us who are also more likely to be high earners and tech opinion setters. And surely there must a way for a company to build trust and explain how/when/where advertising will be displayed that is acceptable to people like us, and everyone wins. Market opportunity?
- pasbesoin 16y agoI've thought so. Haven't gotten my act together, yet, though, with respect to tackling it. EDIT: I guess that can sound kind of narcissistic. But, this is a forum with a start up focus. So I feel I have some license to at least think in that direction. :-)