3 ms·
It looks like we've got SO above efreedom for that query, but it's always nice to find a url that we didn't have that we'd like to be indexed. That lets us chec
by Matt_Cutts 16y ago
It looks like we've got SO above efreedom for that query, but it's always nice to find a url that we didn't have that we'd like to be indexed. That lets us check whether we can improve our crawling/indexing. Thanks for the example!
- millerc 16y agoIf you tell me that sites who chronically scrape content elsewhere get a "pull-down weight" attached to the whole of their content, you've made my day.
- bergie 16y agoThat wouldn't be nice. There is a big difference between copying content from Stack Overflow, to running a Planet news aggregator on a community site for your open source project. The first is an ad scam, the second is valuable service to the members of the community.
- chr15 16y agoThis is why I love Hacker News.
- seanalltogether 16y agoYes SO is above efreedom in this instance, but the SO results are actually worse then the efreedom result based on the query.
- chaosmachine 16y agoThis is a situation I've seen many times in the past. Often the right site is on top, but it's showing the wrong result, meanwhile the scraper site surfaces the correct one. It seems like just showing a few more results from the "real" site would solve the problem.
- SafdarIqbal 16y agoThe _relevant_ SO result http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1097115/bottom-bar-in-nswindow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1097115/bottom-bar-in-nsw... shows up in the collapsed results below the 2nd SO result!!