3 ms·
None of this is true. His "rant" was a well researched memo with extensive links to state of the art research. You should actually read the real thing, once, in
by EdiX 7y ago
None of this is true. His "rant" was a well researched memo with extensive links to state of the art research. You should actually read the real thing, once, instead of the maimed version published by the guardian.
But honestly it's better if you don't know, you're better adjusted to living in this world by remaining ignorant. Just keep reading Vox.
- SquishyPanda23 7y agoI read the whole thing word for word. I recognized the language and wording from scientific racism tracts. I also tracked down his fundraiser which I haven't seen covered in the news.
- manfredo 7y agoIt wasn't "scientific racism". First of all its discussion of science pertained to differences in gender, not race. And the author did not argue that women were worse at engineering, but rather that gender differences affect preferences. While other people may have used his memo to justify sexist beliefs about the capability of female engineers, attributing those words to the original author is at best intellectually dishonest if not outright dishonest.
- Zenbit_UX 7y ago100% agree. Of the people I know that read the memo (incl women), I know of none who disagreed with it. It's genuinely hard to disagree as he presented facts backed by research to support a theory on the gender balance in tech. I will add that many people who only read articles paraphrasing and quoting it, did seem to react unfavorably, likely taking the opinion the article wished to portray.
- UncleMeat 7y agoBigots link to research too. Damore's links weren't the problem. The unsupported conclusions he drew from the research and the policies that he proposed were the problem.
- username90 7y agoWhich policies proposed by him was a problem?