3 ms·
Previous discussions on the StackExchange moderator fiasco saga: * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21173643 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21173643
by brohee 7y ago
Previous discussions on the StackExchange moderator fiasco saga:
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21173643 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21173643
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21288421 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21288421
And a pretty important comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21175143 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21175143
- vintagedave 7y agoYes, and some good replies there. I reserve judgement - we all should, SO has been very secretive with docs and public only in accusations. But I do feel that a big corporation who's apparently acted badly, vs one individual who appears well-intentioned, is something worth posting to HN.
- mlindner 7y ago> And a pretty important comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21175143 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21175143 Except that is in direct conflict from what she herself stated happened in that channel. If anything it's a misconstrued. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFiQPkdb5Qs&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFiQPkdb5Qs&feature=youtu.be
- brohee 7y agoThe fact that Stack Overflow didn't exhibit the "multiple violations" says everything IMHO. They cannot.