3 ms·
Synthetic diamonds are not a Chinese invention but an American one. So if you want to point fingers, point them at GE, Norton & Carborundum[1]. As for who manu
by robert_foss 7y ago
Synthetic diamonds are not a Chinese invention but an American one. So if you want to point fingers, point them at GE, Norton & Carborundum[1].
As for who manufactures them there's a list[2], and most of these companies are not Chinese.
But maybe the more important point is; Why is it a problem that the De Beers diamond mining company is having some competition. De Beers has a _very_ questionable business history[3], and personally I think the world would be better without their exploitation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_diamond#GE_diamond_project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_diamond#GE_diamond_p...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_synthetic_diamond_manufacturers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_synthetic_diamond_manu...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Beers#Relocation_of_indigenous_San_people_in_Botswana https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Beers#Relocation_of_indigen...
- Merrill 7y agoThe early American synthetic diamond producers, such as GE, mainly focused on producing industrial diamonds for grinding and other applications not requiring gem quality. They were never interested in taking on the DeBeers monopoly with gemstones. AFAIK, some of the earliest gem-quality synthetic diamonds were Russian. The Chinese are important because they can evade DeBeers and its influence over the diamond cutting and distribution establishment. I'm all in favor of synthetic gemstones. Carbon is carbon, mined or not.