8 ms·
It's basically a buzzword detector. "this is just a tool for detecting buzzwords" => Bad: 0.9991 - Good: 0.0011 "this is merely a device for detecting artifi
by blauditore 7y ago
It's basically a buzzword detector.
"this is just a tool for detecting buzzwords"
=> Bad: 0.9991 - Good: 0.0011
"this is merely a device for detecting artificially sophisticated words"
=> Bad: 0.0019 - Good: 0.9980
- blauditore 7y ago"linux for sohpisticated when if contextual what but then" => Good: 0.9986 "linux for sohpisticated when if contextual what but then what" => Good: 0.0201
- bencollier49 7y agosohpisticated ?
- thaumasiotes 7y agoI think whether the title is spelled correctly is a valid thing to take into consideration when predicting whether it will get upvotes. Put another way, I think misspelled titles are well within the problem domain here.
- kdmccormick 7y agoIs it within the problem domain? Yes. Is it interesting for this project? Based on my skimming of the README, probably not. I don't think it handles misspellings intelligently.
- fredsanford 7y ago>> "I plan to rewrite Linux in Rust - Linus Torvalds" << Maybe it's sohpisticated because Linus is going to RIIR?
- uwydr 7y agoThat is how it works here, you collect upvotes if you use fancy words. That's why everybody uses the word "orthogonal" here all the time. Have you ever seen that word anywhere else?
- reallydontask 7y agoisn't that orthogonal to the discussion?
- staticautomatic 7y agoYes. I'll take orthogonal any day over HN things like "foot gun" or the cryptic invocation of so and so's "law"
- thaumasiotes 7y ago> That's why everybody uses the word "orthogonal" here all the time. Have you ever seen that word anywhere else? Yes, frequently. It is common in various areas of math -- mathematical background is not something "normal people" usually flaunt, but there are good reasons to expect programmers to have much more such background than average. A good rule of thumb is that people are probably using the words they use because those words make sense to them. See the first panel here: http://www.basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/1/26/how-to-use-your-words.html http://www.basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/1/2...
- vectorEQ 7y agoi'm orthogonally inclined to disagree, but mainly because i'm sitting on a chair
- MiroF 7y ago> Have you ever seen that word anywhere else? Unfortunately far too often both in tech and in CS academia (and I'm talking about informal conversations ie. this is an 'orthogonal idea')
- dsr_ 7y agodeoxyribonucleic cloned asynchronously Bad: 0.0001 - Good: 0.9999
- JoeAltmaier 7y agoSo that's a neural network thing? If the input is 'word space' it trains to detect buzzwords? I'm honestly interested - do we hobble our neural networks with our choice of training space? If for instance, the HN-NN-input space including 'prepositions and word-frequency statistics', would the network train for sentence sophistication? Just because those stats were in front of it?
- MiroF 7y agoThe neural network used here is very weak, it's not going to do much better than word correlations.