> Charles Max Wood's actual crime was being associated with John Sonmez, some brogrammer with a propensity to mouth off. Not saying you are wrong, but if that

> Charles Max Wood's actual crime was being associated with John Sonmez, some brogrammer with a propensity to mouth off. Not saying you are wrong, but if that is indeed the case, then someone should come out and say that out loud. Right now, having a person banned for no clear reason what so ever, only creates uncertainty and division in the community. Edit: Having looked into it, "John Sonmez, some brogrammer with a propensity to mouth off", actually seemed to be trying to take the heat away from a woman being verbally abused and attacked on twitter. One can obviously argue about the way he did that, but how on earth does trying to defend a woman make him a "brogrammer"? Your position seems somewhat biased.