Surely they mean "equality", not "equity"; equity is mostly valued by older homeowners. The author is either unwilling or ignorant of the real reason why manda

Surely they mean "equality", not "equity"; equity is mostly valued by older homeowners. The author is either unwilling or ignorant of the real reason why mandating women on boards is silly: Because about 2% of the population are intersex. Bland restatements of the Economic Problem, like: > If selection criteria are designed to promote equity, some individuals must benefit at the expense of others, on the basis of their immutable characteristics. Given a finite number of positions, this is a mathematically necessary and indefensible consequence. Sure, some resources are limited. However, quite a few resources are not limited. Moreover, access to limited resources should not be withheld in discriminatory ways. What's the argument here? Colleges are mean to conservatives?