3 ms·
It wouldn't be impossible to do faster moderation in these cases. People usually take a bit of time between completion of a post and submission, where you could
by gaogao 7y ago
It wouldn't be impossible to do faster moderation in these cases. People usually take a bit of time between completion of a post and submission, where you could run basic moderation checks.
- gaogao 7y agoRunning it by a human moderator wouldn't likely be possible in that time, but the false positive rate is probably low enough, that you could fall back to delaying the posting in those cases.
- hliyan 7y agoThis gave me an idea: how about you give the author in-editor feedback? As you type your message it runs the content through some sort of sentiment + content analysis and tells you on a scale of 1-10 how civil or factual your post is. This way harmful content not only gets self-moderated, but with repeated, immediate feedback, users actually learn how to write better. I'm not saying that posts with a low score be removed, but perhaps they will receive less priority on the feed. Building that analysis layer is the difficult part.