3 ms·
Hard to have much pity for these companies. In the good old days, they'd post a position, interview until they found one or two people who seemed like they cou
by downerending 7y ago
Hard to have much pity for these companies. In the good old days, they'd post a position, interview until they found one or two people who seemed like they could do the job, and hire one (or both).
These days, it's a grueling, multi-month death march. The last two jobs I was hired for boasted about their steep "hiring funnel"--for every person hired, hundreds of applicants weren't. Watching the process from the inside, I've seen sharp people being declined for the most ridiculous reasons.
In this sort of environment, prudent people become very reluctant to leave their positions, even if something new would be better.
Do you really want people? Prove it.
- tabtab 7y agoSeems the problem is feeding back on itself: it's hard to hire people so org's make sure they "do it right", but "doing it right" scares away applicants. Anyhow we are due for a recession and probably also an AI bubble poppage being that the PE ratios of AI co's don't fit their actual revenues. Some have to die to restore normal PE's, and when a few start it, investor panic speeds up death. In a year or two there will be no IT hiring shortages.