> If you're willing to let a value slide, its not a value. I suspect this is so strict that if we poked at it it wouldn't allow for the existence of values. Si

> If you're willing to let a value slide, its not a value. I suspect this is so strict that if we poked at it it wouldn't allow for the existence of values. Simply, it's probably nearly impossible to make a useful list of even two values that can't possibly come into conflict—if you cannot compromise either, period, what then? So now we can only have one value. But I doubt even a list of one would fare much better under scrutiny and a few reasonable thought experiments & socratic questioning.