> Don't different countries have different views of rights? And so they would apply their views in their own jurisdiction. > What happens when those rights ar

> Don't different countries have different views of rights? And so they would apply their views in their own jurisdiction. > What happens when those rights are at odds? Whichever jurisdiction you stand in correspond to the rights that prevail for you. The way I see it, a country says what the rights of people/humans are, and they defend those beliefs in their own jurisdiction, where they have the absolute power to. > So I think the main issue is, how can all humans have the same protections if different jurisdictions protect different things? I think baddox's comment does not necessarily imply all humans in the world. I interpreted it as all humans in a given jurisdiction.