I'm with you on this one. People saying "it's about the advertising" are being disingenuous, or they haven't read the statements made by the plaintiffs in relat

I'm with you on this one. People saying "it's about the advertising" are being disingenuous, or they haven't read the statements made by the plaintiffs in relation to the case. The argument being made is that the weapon that was marketed to civilians was "military-style" which, being blunt, it is not. By not striking this down as being a ridiculous case it's being left open for more lawsuits of a similar nature. Now, leaving the firearms debate and politics out of it, if the same principles applied to every other industry the alcohol, tobacco, and automotive industries would all be out of business. At some point, society is going to have to realize that we should be protecting our children by at least the same standards that we use to protect our money.