It could be, it's hard to rule out that but the parties are both owners which feels like an odd occurrence for a SLAPP suit. It makes sense as a contract disput

It could be, it's hard to rule out that but the parties are both owners which feels like an odd occurrence for a SLAPP suit. It makes sense as a contract dispute but not much as a SLAPP suit. If it is a SLAPP suit what are the advertisers for Snopes trying to prevent Snopes from publishing?