3 ms·
Sure, and I'm trying to be objective but I believe my assertion is universal. If your content is poor, your return is poor. Perhaps the publication should look
by TheHypnotist 7y ago
Sure, and I'm trying to be objective but I believe my assertion is universal. If your content is poor, your return is poor.
Perhaps the publication should look inward, not outward, and realize the lines between misinformation and satire are paper thin. Somehow, and perhaps its branding, The Onion manages to maintain humor and absurdity with very little room for interpreting it's content as anything but satire.
- beerandt 7y agoBut that's not a decision to be made by Snopes, based on a supposed fact-check. There are plenty of people who don't find the onion, at all. It's not a justification for blacklisting them as fake news.
- dkonofalski 7y ago>blacklisting them as fake news The Onion is, literally, fake news regardless of whether one finds them funny or not. The question is whether people think it's true not whether they think it's funny and that's the only decision being made by a fact-check.
- beerandt 7y agoSo is Babylon Bee. Yet different standards were and are being applied.
- dkonofalski 7y agoDifferent standards were not applied. Where are you getting that from? Forum users posted the article from BB asking for it to be debunked. They haven't posted a request for articles from the Onion and that's likely because the Onion is well-known enough for people to know it's satire. You guys are reaching so hard here.