4 ms·
Put yourself in their shoes. What if one copy says the interest rate is 3.5%, and the other says 3.8%? You SAY they are the same, but are the really? If you ha
by rsclient 7y ago
Put yourself in their shoes. What if one copy says the interest rate is 3.5%, and the other says 3.8%? You SAY they are the same, but are the really?
If you have a strict policy of "one version is the 'original' and the rest are 'copies'", then wording of the 'original' gets legal priority. Legal priority == much lower legal bills.
If you have a policy of "they are all the same", then when they are different, you have a nasty, expensive legal fight.
- technofiend 7y agoThe real issue to me then and now was how do you prove the original is the original? I pointed out then that frankly a good enough photocopy would also be indistinguishable despite a rubber stamp. I no longer remember but I guess the answer to that is red ink. This was prior to color photocopies being readily available. Or maybe they bought themselves a crimper and embossed a stamp.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- muzika 7y agoInk marks on the laler can be chemically analyzed, and I am sure forensics teams learned long ago how to identify a photo copy.
- rsclient 7y agoTake a look under a microscope. The difference between a rubber stamp whose ink bleeds into the paper and a Xerox which is kind of melted on the paper is enormous.