2 ms·
>And there's no reason why someone ... can't be redirected And how would you propose they do that? If there's no article that addresses the specific article, n
by dkonofalski 7y ago
>And there's no reason why someone ... can't be redirected
And how would you propose they do that? If there's no article that addresses the specific article, nothing would come up on a Google search for that which means there's no prompt to redirect them. They would still have to create some kind of content that gets indexed which would serve as the redirect.
- davvolun 7y ago^https?:\/\/(www)?\.theonion\.com.*$ -> http://snopes.com/the-onion http://snopes.com/the-onion As a start, need to get more complex from there (probably exclude theonion's About page, for example, but that covers 90% with almost 0 effort -- and standard analogy from there, if Snopes uses 90% of its effort to cover the first 90%, there's no way they can cover the last 10%; if they use 1% effort to cover 90%, there's still a lot of ability to cover the remaining 5% or 9% (because, let's be realistic, 100% is absolutely impossible).