2 ms·
Why not both? The possibilities don't preclude each other - that there is and it is an attempt to abuse the courts to silence.
by Nasrudith 7y ago
Why not both? The possibilities don't preclude each other - that there is and it is an attempt to abuse the courts to silence.
- rtkwe 7y agoIt could be, it's hard to rule out that but the parties are both owners which feels like an odd occurrence for a SLAPP suit. It makes sense as a contract dispute but not much as a SLAPP suit. If it is a SLAPP suit what are the advertisers for Snopes trying to prevent Snopes from publishing?