4 ms·
This article is a good argument that it should be banned. Also, the US has a lot of influence. They could get chemicals outlawed in other countries if they rea
by jakobegger 7y ago
This article is a good argument that it should be banned.
Also, the US has a lot of influence. They could get chemicals outlawed in other countries if they really wanted to. I mean, they got the whole world to adopt biometric passports, and they managed to get banks worldwide to agree to their reporting requirements.
But when it's about dangerous chemicals, they throw their hands in the air. Presumably because the industry needs some place to buy their poisons.
- JulianMorrison 7y agoIndustry could just make something else. There's a cold callousness to trading off human lives against mere sunk costs.