3 ms·
Technically, it is. The relevant law is called anti-SLAPP
by turc1656 7y ago
Technically, it is. The relevant law is called anti-SLAPP
- rtkwe 7y agoThis seems more like a contract dispute spun way out of control than your standard SLAPP suit. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21514478 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21514478
- Nasrudith 7y agoWhy not both? The possibilities don't preclude each other - that there is and it is an attempt to abuse the courts to silence.
- rtkwe 7y agoIt could be, it's hard to rule out that but the parties are both owners which feels like an odd occurrence for a SLAPP suit. It makes sense as a contract dispute but not much as a SLAPP suit. If it is a SLAPP suit what are the advertisers for Snopes trying to prevent Snopes from publishing?