> The linked article has the benefit of 400 years of additional scholarship beyond Diaz's account. Scholarship on what documents? If you don't have new evidenc

> The linked article has the benefit of 400 years of additional scholarship beyond Diaz's account. Scholarship on what documents? If you don't have new evidence, all you have is every generation's new academic fads applied to the same old text. This isn't Physics. Progress is unlikely.