The article draws comparisons to Mexico, where bombs are a part of gang warfare. Guns are efficient killing machines but I'd argue they represent a greater cha

The article draws comparisons to Mexico, where bombs are a part of gang warfare. Guns are efficient killing machines but I'd argue they represent a greater chance of being caught when attempting to kill or injure a lot of people at once. And this is terrorism, per the article, it's just seen as intra gang, not general public. That's also a +1 for a bomb, which can be hidden in plain sight and doesn't have to "work" to be good as a deterrent for rival gangs.