4 ms·
I mostly agree, but more regulation means higher barriers to entry which would suit them. It's win-win. We should really just stop using Google so much. You go
by cs02rm0 7y ago
I mostly agree, but more regulation means higher barriers to entry which would suit them. It's win-win.
We should really just stop using Google so much. You go first, I can't be bothered to switch!
- zupa-hu 7y ago> You go first, I can't be bothered to switch! I had to upvote this. :D
- vim-guru 7y agoSwitched about a year ago to duckduckgo. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles, but the search results are pretty darn good. Give it a go :)
- birdyrooster 7y agoI quit, divested, closed my accounts and never looked back (except for YouTube but I block the ads).
- fauigerzigerk 7y ago>but more regulation means higher barriers to entry which would suit them That's a recently very popular idea, but in this general form it is simply untrue. It depends on the specifics of any regulation. We can regulate oligopolists in a way that doesn't affect anyone else.