3 ms·
It feels like if your goal here was to improve the web you'd go into some explanation of why these are bad practices and how it can be done better.
by anm89 7y ago
It feels like if your goal here was to improve the web you'd go into some explanation of why these are bad practices and how it can be done better.
- shhsshs 7y agoClick on each one and you’ll find an explanation
- bbody 7y agoI stumbled onto that by accidentally, really needs more context.
- oneeyedpigeon 7y agoYou could almost add "Hiding links via styling" to the list, but I feel like this site gets away with it; even though they're not blue, it's still pretty obvious those headers are links.
- ng12 7y agoI feel like there's something poetic about a site complaining that people do HTML "wrong" having terrible UX.
- bartread 7y agoIt's not terrible UX. Whilst the headings aren't blue, they are underlined, which makes it pretty clear they're links. I don't love hyperlinks in headings, and would prefer a more explicit link to each good example, tabs for good and bad, or even inline content to show the good examples below the bad, but it's a bit strong to be calling it "terrible". Nowadays people are pretty slack about links: good UX generally mandates either a different colour to body text, or underlining, or both. Blue has for many years been the default rather than the standard: people have been heavily deviating from it since the 90s. Underlining tends to be optional if there's some other way of distinguishing links (here there isn't).
- mmatuzo 7y agoI've added "read more" links to make it more obvious that there's more! https://www.htmhell.dev/ https://www.htmhell.dev/
- anm89 7y agoAwesome!! Thanks