3 ms·
No, he's asking for something with the same features and consistency, it can be designed however you like.
by mateuszf 7y ago
No, he's asking for something with the same features and consistency, it can be designed however you like.
- beatgammit 7y agoThe issue is that many believe that the feature set is the problem. Why do you need consistency across services that have little in common? The basic idea of an init system is pretty simple: start services in such a way that the system comes up reliably. There are two main approaches here, simple but inefficient or complex and more efficient. The FreeBSD/rsysv approach is the former, while the systemd/launchd approach is the latter. If I just want to make sure services start on boot in the right order, why not just have a script run it all? For 99% of use cases, it's good enough, so why complicate matters? I do appreciate systemd and the faster boots I get from it, but I still find myself longing for similar init systems.