Please consider bch's comment [1]. Unless you want to write quite a bit more, I believe you should actually go back to '1991' in your text. While most think tha

Please consider bch's comment [1]. Unless you want to write quite a bit more, I believe you should actually go back to '1991' in your text. While most think that vim is indeed 'vi improved', there is a fair consensus that vim is not vi. [1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2149367 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2149367