4 ms·
I really don't want this to come across as rude, as maybe I have missed something but this sounds like you've set pricing before you actually know what you're g
by traskjd 16y ago
I really don't want this to come across as rude, as maybe I have missed something but this sounds like you've set pricing before you actually know what you're going to have to spend on hosting yourself?
Happy to hear how I've missed something :-)
- shykes 16y agoThat's a tough decision that all PaaS providers face: offer simple predictable pricing, and face the risk of unpredictable, possibly even negative margins? Or safely convey the infrastructure's variable costs, leaving Amazon in control of the relationship with your customer? The AppHarbour guys are right to focus on pricing as early as they can: it's the hardest part. I advise the myriad of Heroku clones out there to do the same.
- lucisferre 16y agoI'll second that. Especially in the .net ecosystem, it will be much easier for me to sell a PaaS provider to enterprise customers with a pricing model than without.
- runesoerensen 16y agoIt should be noted that these are preliminary prices. I've updated the page so this is clearer. That being said we're quite certain about the pricing structure from what we've gathered so far. Thanks for your inputs :-)