2 ms·
You're forgetting that this is a satellite constellation- I'm not sure what the orbital parameters are offhand, but I'd divide that number by at least 4 (and ma
by beerandt 7y ago
You're forgetting that this is a satellite constellation- I'm not sure what the orbital parameters are offhand, but I'd divide that number by at least 4 (and maybe up to 20), based on number of satellites over the service area(s) at any given moment.
Last I saw, they were reconfiguring deployment plans to go for higher density constellation in the lower latitudes before worldwide coverage, so I'm not sure if this is even knowable at this point.