9 ms·I think technically yes, because the present tense should be referring to Raku instead.by lmkg 7y agoI think technically yes, because the present tense should be referring to Raku instead.mclehman 7y agoRaku is not the direct successor to Perl, active Perl development continues.gpvos 7y agoNo, Perl still exists (in the form of Perl 5) and is used a lot and will continue to be developed, now unhampered by Raku (formerly known as Perl 6).