4 ms·
I think this is awesome... I can't even imagine the overhead of unpacking and then "scanning" each of those letters by hand and yet, and this was still: higher
by rubyn00bie 7y ago
I think this is awesome... I can't even imagine the overhead of unpacking and then "scanning" each of those letters by hand and yet, and this was still: higher bandwidth, lower latency, and a more secure transmission method.
Also a big reminder of just how far we've come as I sit here about to communicate with the entire world almost instantly.
Finally, it also reminds me of one of my favorite RFCs, "IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service": https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2549 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2549
- desdiv 7y ago>I can't even imagine the overhead of unpacking and then "scanning" each of those letters by hand At this point in the war, all mail (not just those to service members) entering and exiting the United States were opened by hand and microfilmed for censorship and counter-espionage purposes by the Office of Censorship[0]. So technically the mail opening and scanning aren't extra overheads, since those same steps apply to regular snail mail as well. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Censorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Censorship
- Spooky23 7y agoThe post office had bazillions of employees and alot of cash. My dad used to write letters and QSL cards to people all over the world in the 60s/70s. He recalled that frequently letters to soviet bloc states, northern ireland, and some african countries were opened, either by the US or other country.