3 ms·
But if you remove all streaming/porn/torrent traffic it would be able to handle a lot more of the global traffic.
by tpetry 7y ago
But if you remove all streaming/porn/torrent traffic it would be able to handle a lot more of the global traffic.
- hamandcheese 7y agoThat’s a bit tautological wouldn’t you say?
- nexuist 7y agoI'm sure people who intend to do business will accept such restrictions as long as they can access email and Salesforce dashboards. Although it might break the spirit of net neutrality (which, to be fair, isn't really a thing anymore anyways).
- bufferoverflow 7y agoWhat's the point of such internet? I can already buy low-cap 4G cheaply.
- millettjon 7y agoExcept where you can't. Lots places have no coverage.
- jandrese 7y agoIf you remove all of that what's the point of even having Internet anymore?
- dotancohen 7y agoActually, during the early 2010's I had heard from a reputable source that half to two-thirds of the internet traffic was "unwanted by the end user" i.e. spam, involuntary software updates, and advertising. Another source from the same time period mentioned that about a quarter of all internet traffic originated from Youtube.
- btian 7y agoOr just charge based on volume. I'm sure USAF is willing to pay a lot for true global Internet access on their planes