2 ms·
Evidently "consent" isn't lawfully required. The hope is that any breakthrough might lower healthcare costs, and in the worst case scenario at least some patien
by rickncliff 7y ago
Evidently "consent" isn't lawfully required. The hope is that any breakthrough might lower healthcare costs, and in the worst case scenario at least some patients might benefit which is still a win.
- AlexandrB 7y ago> Evidently "consent" isn't lawfully required. Ethics != law. Just because it's lawful doesn't mean it's ethical or that we shouldn't be outraged. Edit: > The hope is that any breakthrough might lower healthcare costs Perhaps then Google should instead lobby hard for single-payer. Most countries with a single-payer systems have lower health care costs than the US. It's a proven solution that will lower costs, not a "hope".