3 ms·
Aircraft carriers are a couple acres of movable sovereign territory. There is immense influence to be had using one to shape behaviour of adversaries in times
by chriselles 7y ago
Aircraft carriers are a couple acres of movable sovereign territory.
There is immense influence to be had using one to shape behaviour of adversaries in times of less than war.
Historically, every time a foreign nation has allegedly managed to get a submarine inside a carrier battle group’s defensive bubble has made the news.
Personally, I think the future of warfare will see a shift away from a carrier “hub and spoke” model to a decentralised/distributed model.
But it will require a new platform that can match or exceed the force projection capability of a carrier in terms of:
Radius of weapons/sensor delivery away from platform
Throw weight of weapons delivery
Repeatability/persistence of weapons/sensor delivery
Perhaps the future is more amphibious assault ships like USS America carrying a dozen F35s(fewer eggs, more baskets).
Perhaps the future is arsenal ships loaded with missiles and drone ships loaded with recoverable drones.
Perhaps the future is C17s , C5s , C130s acting as airborne drone carriers.
But I suspect the age of the aircraft carrier is approaching it’s end, but we will only know for sure if a short sharp large scale conventional war occurs between peers and near peers or if a major lasting economic disaster compelled them to be mothballed.
- mips_avatar 7y agoI am assuming the us navy must have some plans to protect carriers they don’t make public. Because otherwise using them in the open seems nuts.
- sunstone 7y agoRaining down hellfire from orbit might be an effective alternative to aircraft carriers. With Musk's rockets it might even be cheaper. I wonder if there's anyone pencilling their way through this scenario at the Pentagon?