You quoted GP as saying: > > "There is no moral issue with inequality" Then you replied with: > Well, there is. <snip some unrelated discussion about Regulat

You quoted GP as saying: > > "There is no moral issue with inequality" Then you replied with: > Well, there is. <snip some unrelated discussion about Regulatory Capture [0]> At no point did you make an argument that there is a principled, moral problem with Wealth Inequality. My "diatribe" was simply pointing out that there was a moral argument to be made, but that you weren't making it, and instead you were actually agreeing that there's nothing wrong with a little inequality now and again. Personally, I don't care what stance you take, I was just trying to help you decide on a better one than you were taking. ;-) [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture