3 ms·
That is very true. I didn't mean to imply that any dirt-track could receive that designation. It is however a 'checkbox' for those airports that do infact mee
by UI_at_80x24 7y ago
That is very true. I didn't mean to imply that any dirt-track could receive that designation. It is however a 'checkbox' for those airports that do infact meet those requirements. {thus my "checkbox" statement}
Before I ever heard of such designation, I had a very glamorous opinion of what was required to be an 'international airport'. Things like regular flights from all over the world landing and taking off. Huge passenger gateways & terminals, and thousands/millions of people being served every day.
The airport in my town has 3 runways.
is serviced by 2 carriers.
has under 20 (closer to 10) arrivals on average per day.
Is only open part-time. (weekends + holidays)
It has 'international airport' status.
A tremendously HUGE Russian Cargo plane landed here to deliver a factory for a major automaker.
My point in the OP was that even 'minor' airports could be affected by that international border.
- cameronh90 7y agoThree runways is still one runway more than Heathrow, which is one of the busiest international airports in the world. Not undermining your point, just thought it was interesting.
- rtkwe 7y agoLondons' airports have been kind of a mess for ages now because they've gotten hemmed in by developments on all sides. Heathrow really really wishes it could have more runways but it'd require bulldozing loads of housing developments and even more noise for the existing houses.