Here is where out views diverge: you think reducing volume of supply is important, I think controlling supply is important. You think reducing volume means wha

Here is where out views diverge: you think reducing volume of supply is important, I think controlling supply is important. You think reducing volume means what little supply is available will be used against high value targets only. In reality, the smaller supply will focus more on high value exploits which will still be leveraged at the same scale. Even if that was not true, you still have no control over exploit sales and use. Allowing places like NSO and Zerodium to thrive with some control and restrictions is the best outcome. But really, do we even have law makers that understand any of this or perhaps the NSA/CIA can control them. Normal security companies have intel community ties,I think that can be acheived here as well.