4 ms·
It's a correct translation, but funny because of its stilted language. It would have been merely old-timey in Japanese, but in English it's rendered as centuri
by hapless 7y ago
It's a correct translation, but funny because of its stilted language.
It would have been merely old-timey in Japanese, but in English it's rendered as centuries-old vernacular. "Spoony" ceased to be common language in the 19th century. "Bard" in the 18th, except in limited senses referencing archaic usage. No one is that old!
It's not wrong, just a little too far.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoYou'll note that in the fantasy genre, such archaic words as bard are actually quite common, so I don't think 'spoony' is ridiculous at all. It is not uncommon for media to use completely made up words, why is pulling a single instance of an archaic one "too far"?