4 ms·
I happened to speak to a friend this evening who is a biochemist She reckoned refined glucose was the real bad guy, as it's what your muscles actually burn, wh
by sideshowb 7y ago
I happened to speak to a friend this evening who is a biochemist
She reckoned refined glucose was the real bad guy, as it's what your muscles actually burn, while other sugars need converting first. Therefore its distribution within the body is unregulated - you eat it, it gets burned, no question. Contrasting the others, for which the conversion process serves as some form of regulation and is likely to run slower when you don't actually need it.
She also acknowledged fructose as a problem, primarily when its in corn syrup (or vast quantities of fruit juice) as you don't have to digest cell walls etc to get it. Whereas in fruit the absorption is slower (though for something juicy like an orange I can't imagine that much slower)
I'm sure this is an oversimplification and any errors are mine!
- BubRoss 7y agoI'm not an expert but I'll say a few things. First glucose is a molecule, so I don't think there can be a 'refined' version. Also if glucose was immediately burned it wouldn't have a chance to be turned into fat, though I don't know if that is actually true. If you watch 'sugar the bitter truth' you can see a lot of scientific studies condensed into a good presentation.