It's a pity they decided to put anything about climate change in the story, and especially in the sub-heading - this story has good information in it that could

It's a pity they decided to put anything about climate change in the story, and especially in the sub-heading - this story has good information in it that could be beneficial to tons of people - and it's going to make many discount the accuracy of the information as a whole, right from the beginning. If this story had taken out 3 of the 5 mentions of climate, it would have had the same info: there are steps that can be taken before and during a disaster to help people survive and thrive a disaster. these bits are not needed in the article at all, they add nothing, taking them away takes away nothing (other than making people question legitimacy): "As climate change makes disasters more severe" "As climate change makes natural disasters more common" "As the climate continues to change" Good info that could have many benefits for many people that almost seems packaged into a "submarine article" for pushing the climate change agenda with 'think of the children' - pity indeed.