I don't mind a discussion, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. > But this case does not support it. Seems to me it supports it. This was a product that seemed safe, no t

I don't mind a discussion, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. > But this case does not support it. Seems to me it supports it. This was a product that seemed safe, no testing needed, just like "not tested on animals" products - the ingredients are probably safe, no need to test. Except that in the particular way it was used here, it wasn't safe. To lead back to cosmetics: What if a particular mixture of two otherwise harmless ingredients is toxic? What if an ingredient is thought safe, but next to the eye is actually not safe? Or for food additives, thought safe - except if used in an acidic food, or heated, or mixed with some other additive?