3 ms·
> What do you mean? These seem synonymous to me. What I meant was similar to this talk: https://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism https://blog.gol
by westoque 7y ago
> What do you mean? These seem synonymous to me.
What I meant was similar to this talk: https://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism https://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism where there is also a load balancer example around 20:20 and using go channels (the primitive I’m pertaining to)
- biggestdecision 7y agoChannels aren't a way to avoid mutexes/locking, they are just meant to be simpler to write & reason about. Channels are implemented using mutexes under the hood.