> Protesting against "offensive and racially charged speech" that is tailored to provoke the left because it goes against everything the left stands for is very

> Protesting against "offensive and racially charged speech" that is tailored to provoke the left because it goes against everything the left stands for is very different from silencing conservative speech in general. Your assertion is not only oblivious to the point (suppressing free speech) but it is also miopic and self-serving (i.e., "if a speaker expresses ideas I don't like then I somehow have the right to suppress it"). The whole moral lesson that a free society depends on the right to express ideas that you personally don't support is lost to you.